DON'T BLINK!

This whole episode was so awesome! My mind was blown and when the episode was over it all made so much sense but was still amazing. I loved this part in particular where he is answering all of her questions but he is in 1969 and she is in the present. Also, the very end scene where she could finally let go of this confusing thing that had happened to her one year earlier, her friend had died and so had this boy she met. She couldn't let it go and then when she finally addressed Dr. Who in her present (his future) she finally understood and could move on with her life. She then holds that guys hand and can move on from this terrifying and puzzling thing that has happened. This reminds me of the ying and yang we were talking about in class. That once she addressed this dark creative thing, once she spoke to Dr. Who, she could let go and move on and be a better person for it. Overall, this episode was awesome. I want to watch more.

Another very interesting thing that this episode did for me....it made even a simple normal thing that I see every day absolutely terrifying.  The statues in this episode are absolutely brilliant and so creepy. He took something that seems safe and makes it horrifying. Something that is all around us that we normally trust.  This also reminded me of the sherlock holmes episode we watched about the taxi cab driver who was really a murderer.  The people and things that we trust are the things that can become the most scary.

A Modern Masterpiece?

 Le Centre Pompidou

Built in 1977, the architects Renzo Piano, and Richard Rogers moved beyond the standard architectural techniques and created a modern masterpiece. Ignoring the classical style, all the "ugly" things which are usually hidden behind the walls of a building instead decorated the buildings exterior.  Things like the brightly covered heating ducts, elevators, escalators, structural poles, and even plumbing pipes, create a rigid and eschewed type of building.

Especially compared to all of the well-preserved architecture that makes up Paris, this building most definitely does stand out and has had a very wide range of  responses from the French population. However, it has been visited by more than 180 million people since it has opened and is becoming more and more loved.  The square just in front of it is full of street-performers and dancers.  Little cafe's and gelato shops make it a fun place to just hang around and admire. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in Paris is located right near this monumental building and has actually made this area more known and accessible than before it's inception.

Let Us Now Praise Famous Men

Walker Evans, Floyd and Lucille Burroughs on Porch, Hale County Alabama, 1936.

Walker Evans captured the life of the commoners in America during the great depression.  Agee and Walker traveled the states trying to see what life was really like during these hard times. In this photo, the dirty bare feet show not only a lack of shoes, but that the father was a worker in the fields. You can see the sweat that has plastered the father's hair back. Trying to sustain his family, this photo definitely describes what the book states as: "showing the terrible economic deprivations of the Great Depression of the 1930's."

As I looked at more of Walker Evans photos,  I thought of Charlie Chaplin's film Modern Times and the social message that it carried.  Photography, like film, also can send a social message and give an understanding to others without a single word. While the subjects of this photograph are dirty and wearing old raggedy clothes, Evans seems to have found the beauty despite the hardship. His use of lines and shadow is pleasant to the eye when looking at this image. The placement of his subjects helps the eye know where to start and finish.  His photographic eye helped to capture not just a documentation of how life really was, but beautiful images that are worth thousands of dollars.

The Eating Machine

This scene of Modern Times, the 1936 comedy directed and produced by Charlie Chaplin, is particularly interesting because it touches on all the major themes of this film. The idea that machines are more efficient, and more productive than humans is proven wrong as the machine goes haywire in the middle of the demonstration. As the main character is force fed screws and then later bashed in the face with the dessert, the machine is useless.

 

Just as our main character is a guinea pig for this brand new eating machine, so are the many workers who are forced to work crazy hours and put their lives in danger just to make enough money to feed their families. At the beginning of this era, many workers lost limbs and lives and only with time did this change. 

Similarly, just the fact that this machine was even considered by the corporation shows the need and push for better and more efficient production.  This machine would allow the workers to be fed while having their hands free to keep working.  Cutting out their lunch break entirely would put this company ahead of their competitors.  This insane machine was refused but only after it malfunctioned.  The eagerness to increase productivity outweighs humanity. Even their very personal moments of eating and choice of what to eat is attempted to be regulated, just as they all are during their work days.  All of the workers are treated as pieces of a machine.

Lastly, this scene is just funny! (Personal Side Note) My favorite was the sponge wiper thing that wipes his face off after each bite.  Especially when things go haywire, this part always makes me laugh. 

Moments of Movement and Life

Les Nympheas

Up close shot of water-lilies

Actual size of the panels created by  Monet

A single panel in Musee de l'orangerie, Paris

It is clear that Monet understood visual perception, the representation of the instantaneous impact on the eye, and the ever changing appearance of life.  His accurate depiction of light and it's changing motion changed the way art could be composed. His use of broken brush strokes helped to capture what really was happening and what the eye really saw. Monet, Manet, Renoir, and other famous impressionist artists began a revolutionary style of art very different from the traditional french way.

The Salon D'art which was in charge of accepting only the best of artwork and most traditional representations of France's artistic style, refused Manet and Monet's paintings on a regular basis. Because of this, they created their own salon: Le Salon des refuses-the salon of the refused. Making the traditionalists even more upset, the salon of the refused started attracting more visitors than the regular Salon d'art. His style was revolutionary.

A Cruel and Selfish King

Eugene Delacroix, The Death of Sardanapalus, 1826

Violent emotions are shown here with broad brushstrokes in the romantic era style.  Just as we talked about in class, the horror and awe is portrayed in this painting, especially when understanding the back story.  The Assyrian king, faced with the destruction of his palace by the Medes decided to prevent his enemies from enjoying his possessions safter his death by ordering that his wives horses and dogs be killed. Just the way that the king is laying on his bed depicts his awful resolve and unmoving pride.

 He uses free violent brush strokes to portray the savage brutality. Just last month I was able to visit this painting in the Louvre museum at Paris. It is enormous sizing up to 145 inches X 195 inches. Standing in front of this cruel scene is breathtaking and it almost has an air of unreality. There is so much movement and the colors that are used are rich and warm.  The detail and emotion is moving and really tells a story that requires self-reflection.

Opera in Romanticism

Opera Garnier

1861-1875

The opera garnier is one fo the most famous opera houses in the world. As the text book emphasizes, the opera flourished in the romantic era, and enthusiastic fans came together (as 1/3 of the population lived in cities at this time) to enjoy this form of art all over the world. As the industrial revolution brought people together, opera's became more and more famous. As we saw in the example of La Traviata, these operas placed an emphasis on personal feelings and expression, emotion rather than intellect, and an exploration and dissection of personal hopes and fears.  As viewed in La Traviata, the woman's tuberculosis and fear of death is explored as she refuses to delve into a deep love.  Instead she touches only the surface of life's gifts because she does not want to get hurt in the already painful state she is in.  When she does give into love, we see a love of the fantastic and exotic creative imagination. mystical attachment to the world of nature that was also the result of the search for new sensations, and individual emotions.